Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is a...

Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is an important part of the picture. But I don't think that expanding the legal definition of copyright outside of actual copyright infringement is the right move.

-Edward Felten

Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is a... meanings

Unfortunately we do not have any meanings for this quote yet. If you think you know what it means, please be the first to explain this quote to our readers.

Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is a... quote in Urdu

Unfortunately we do not have any translation for this quote in Urdu yet. If you think you can translate it in Urdu, please be the first to translate this quote in Urdu for our readers.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Who said "Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is a... "?

"Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is a... " is one of a famous quotes by Edward Felten. Complete quote is as follows;
"Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is an important part of the picture. But I don't think that expanding the legal definition of copyright outside of actual copyright infringement is the right move."

What is "Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is a... "?

"Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is an important part of the picture. But I don't think that expanding the legal definition of copyright outside of actual copyright infringement is the right move." This is a quote by Edward Felten which is about . He is known to have been associated with numerous other thought provoking quotes on these topics like;

  • I think a child should be allowed to take his father's or mother's name at will on coming of age. Paternity is a legal fiction.
"

What does "Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is a... " mean?

This quote is primarily about legal although it also includes other themes like . It is attributed to Edward Felten. Complete quote is as follows;
"Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is an important part of the picture. But I don't think that expanding the legal definition of copyright outside of actual copyright infringement is the right move."